You're about to create your best presentation ever

Software Roadmap Powerpoint Template

Create your presentation by reusing a template from our community or transition your PowerPoint deck into a visually compelling Prezi presentation.

Software Technology Roadmap

Transcript: Expected Outcomes The successful implementation of Strategic Priority 4 is expected to result in a 30% increase in user satisfaction ratings. Additionally, improved user engagement and retention rates are anticipated, ultimately driving increased customer loyalty and revenue. Implementation Timeline Call to Action Aligning all stakeholders with the roadmap is essential for successful implementation. A proactive engagement strategy should be established to ensure that everyone understands their role in driving the success of the technology roadmap. The implementation of Strategic Priority 4 is projected to unfold over a 12-month timeline. Key milestones include user research in the first quarter, prototype development in the second quarter, and beta testing by the end of the third quarter. Conclusion and Next Steps Strategic Priority 4 Implementation Challenges This section examines the strategic priorities of the software technology roadmap, highlighting the key takeaways and outlining the path forward. Understanding these elements is essential for effective implementation. Future Directions This section outlines Strategic Priority 4, which focuses on enhancing user experience through innovative technology solutions. The priority aims to create a seamless and efficient interface that meets user needs and boosts satisfaction. Key Features of Priority 4 Key implementation challenges include resource allocation, training requirements, and ensuring stakeholder buy-in. Addressing these challenges early on will be critical to avoid disruptions in the implementation process. In the coming years, the roadmap will shift to embrace emerging technologies such as AI, machine learning, and cloud computing. These advancements will be crucial for maintaining competitive advantage and meeting evolving customer needs. This strategic priority includes features such as responsive design, personalized user interfaces, and intuitive navigation systems. These features are essential in making software more user-friendly and accessible to varied user demographics. Summary of Strategic Priorities What is Strategic Priority 4? The software technology roadmap is focused on four strategic priorities that align with our long-term vision. Each priority is designed to enhance functionality, improve user experience, drive innovation, and ensure sustainable growth. Strategic Priority 4 emphasizes the importance of user experience in software technology. By focusing on enhancing usability and accessibility, this priority aims to address the evolving expectations of users. What is Strategic Priority 3? Strategic Priority 3 Strategic Priority 3 addresses a pivotal aspect of our software technology initiative, focusing on enhancing user experience and optimizing performance. This priority aims to integrate advanced features that not only meet current user demands but also anticipate future needs. This section outlines Strategic Priority 3, focusing on its critical description, key features, implementation timeline, and expected outcomes, providing a comprehensive view of this priority's significance in the software technology roadmap. Expected Outcomes Key Features of Priority 3 Key features of Strategic Priority 3 include user-centric design enhancements and real-time system updates. These features are designed to improve accessibility and streamline operations, making the software more intuitive and efficient for end-users. Expected outcomes of Strategic Priority 3 include a significant reduction in user onboarding time and an increase in the overall user satisfaction score by at least 20%. Additionally, the implementation is projected to reduce operational costs by 15% through improved efficiency. Implementation Timeline Benefits of Strategic Priority 3 The implementation of Strategic Priority 3 is scheduled over the next twelve months, divided into three phases. Phase one involves the development of core features, phase two focuses on user testing and feedback collection, and phase three will enact the full deployment based on gathered insights. Implementing Strategic Priority 3 will lead to increased user satisfaction and retention. Furthermore, it is expected to drive higher engagement rates through enhanced functionalities tailored to user preferences. Strategic Priority 2: Focus on User Experience User experience is paramount in the evolution of our software technology. Enhancing usability and interface design will lead to greater customer satisfaction and retention. Description of Priority 2 Key Features and Benefits This strategic priority emphasizes the importance of optimizing user experience through intuitive design and seamless interactions. The goal is to ensure that users can navigate the software efficiently and effectively, reducing friction and enhancing productivity. Key features of this priority include user-centered design, responsive layouts, and personalized interfaces. These features drive engagement, reduce training

Software Tools - Roadmap

Transcript: Roadmap C++ Memory Leak Detector Pros: Very easy setup - attaches to a process; no compilation directives or libraries necessary Various analytics and filtering options Cons: Very high learning curve Difficult to decipher results False positives, especially for STL No static analysis TFS 2010 Code Collaborator Code Generation Online Forum For Developers to: Discuss general development issues Track solutions and search for previous solutions Document BKM's Unit Testing Takeaways Quality Pros: Newest released VS (better support) New language features (C++ and .NET) Improved IDE performance (Intellisense) Improved debugger (.NET Intellitrace) Full TFS 2010 support Cons: Overhead of migrating code (breaking changes, down time) Customer impact (CorTEX, L1?) Productivity Infrastructure & Process Features Visual Studio integration C++ support Memory leak detection in coding Concurrency violations Buffer overflows Maintainability (dead code, unreachable code, file structure, architecture, unused code) Design and Review tools, metrics Cons: High overhead - slows down VS Code Generation Need to pilot a dedicated SCRUM SW solution Upgrade to VS 2010 after CDV Upgrade to TFS 2010 after VS 2010 upgrade For C# Development get ReSharper PlanetBlue Wiki created - use it and maintain it Things to consider Get (and read) the Refactoring and Heads First Design Pattern Books Hosted by Intel IT (Enterprise License) Impact Estimated ~1-2 Weeks for HDMT Conversion (last attempt took about 1 week to get main projects running offline) CorTex will need to be converted Test Classes probably need to be written in VS 2010 L1 didn't seem to be an issue, probably doesn't need to convert Pros: Enhanced Agile/Scrum Templates Improved performance, especially for distributed teams Cons: Migrating from TFS 2008 (may lose history and/or work items) Why Upgrade? IT is migrating to TFS 2010 from 2008 Fully compatible with Visual Studio 2010 (2008 requires special steps) Enhanced capabilities such as improved speed and new process templates THE book on Refactoring Identifying bad code Improving code using established methods/templates Techniques for transitioning code into design patterns Refactoring Moving Forward Due to conversion down time and CorTex impact it was decided to bin this until after WW48 Real VNC: Useful and speedy desktop sharing tool. Ideal for remote eXtreme Programming More Tools of Interest Planning Poker: Free online group estimation tool prepare for motion sickness.... Web Based Code Review Software Tools Bullseye Code Coverage: C++ code coverage and analysis. Requires service enabled and recompilation. Could automate for nightly runs and report coverage changes. We have licenses. Others: NCover, TestCocoon, MSTest LiveMeeting (or IM/Lync desktop sharing). Adequate remote for XP. Options PlanetBlue Wiki SharePoint TFS (not recommended) Others? (Visual Studio Add-In for C++ and .NET) Currently in use: Excel and TFS Pros: Accessible to everyone TFS integrates with Visual Studio Cons: Information is duplicated and maintained in two places Excel and TFS are never in sync Limited or no automation pertinent to our process Difficult to manage in a geo-dispersed team Scrum/Agile support: Excel has none (it's not a Scrum tool), TFS 2008 has limited support and we leverage little to none of it Visual Assist TFS 2010 Online Developer Forum Online Developer Forum Pros: Web interface supports code reviews, active or stand-alone Tracks comments and action items Integrates with TFS and works with Shelvesets, Changesets, and individual files Intel has some floating licenses Cons: A little complicated initially Can be slow on first creation of file diffs for review Floating licenses are limited, may not be enough Skill Why Upgrade? Newer language features, both in C++ and .NET Full TFS 2010 Support Enhanced debugging capabilities in .NET Intellitrace (.NET), sticky values Enhanced IDE Improved Intellisense Improved refactoring and code-snippet automation Overall, less need for 3rd party add-ins Better support (service packs, more current) Excellent book on Design Patterns and OOD Applicable to any OO Language Pros: Excellent Refactoring and code generation Light (doesn't bog down VS) Integrated unit test support Cons: Only works for C# (and VB) ReSharper Impact? We need to work with IT to try to migrate our existing project from 2008 to 2010 Potential of not being able to migrate - starting anew. Could impact existing work items - may not migrate properly If we do migrate, we may not be able to use new process templates such as the SCRUM template. Pros: Some refactoring and code generation Syntax highlighting Works for C++ and .NET Cons: Very heavy (bogs down VS) Refactoring and code generation for C++ is extremely limited Timing: Recommend this activity only after upgrading to Visual Studio 2010 Bi-Weekly training session led by developers Pick from a list of topics, learn it, present it Static Code Analsis Skill Development Refactoring

Now you can make any subject more engaging and memorable